Paper detail

Iterative trajectory reweighting for estimation of equilibrium and non-equilibrium observables

We present two algorithms by which a set of short, unbiased trajectories can be iteratively reweighted to obtain various observables. The first algorithm estimates the stationary (steady state) distribution of a system by iteratively reweighting the trajectories based on the average probability in each state. The algorithm applies to equilibrium or non-equilibrium steady states, exploiting the `left' stationarity of the distribution under dynamics -- i.e., in a discrete setting, when the column vector of probabilities is multiplied by the transition matrix expressed as a left stochastic matrix. The second procedure relies on the `right' stationarity of the committor (splitting probability) expressed as a row vector. The algorithms are unbiased, do not rely on computing transition matrices, and make no Markov assumption about discretized states. Here, we apply the procedures to a one-dimensional double-well potential, and to a 208$μ$s atomistic Trp-cage folding trajectory from D.E. Shaw Research.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.