Paper detail

Iterative Optimization of Pseudo Ground-Truth Face Image Quality Labels

While recent face recognition (FR) systems achieve excellent results in many deployment scenarios, their performance in challenging real-world settings is still under question. For this reason, face image quality assessment (FIQA) techniques aim to support FR systems, by providing them with sample quality information that can be used to reject poor quality data unsuitable for recognition purposes. Several groups of FIQA methods relying on different concepts have been proposed in the literature, all of which can be used for generating quality scores of facial images that can serve as pseudo ground-truth (quality) labels and can be exploited for training (regression-based) quality estimation models. Several FIQA appro\-aches show that a significant amount of sample-quality information can be extracted from mated similarity-score distributions generated with some face matcher. Based on this insight, we propose in this paper a quality label optimization approach, which incorporates sample-quality information from mated-pair similarities into quality predictions of existing off-the-shelf FIQA techniques. We evaluate the proposed approach using three state-of-the-art FIQA methods over three diverse datasets. The results of our experiments show that the proposed optimization procedure heavily depends on the number of executed optimization iterations. At ten iterations, the approach seems to perform the best, consistently outperforming the base quality scores of the three FIQA methods, chosen for the experiments.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.