Paper detail

Iterative Expectation for Multi Period Information Retrieval

Many Information Retrieval (IR) models make use of offline statistical techniques to score documents for ranking over a single period, rather than use an online, dynamic system that is responsive to users over time. In this paper, we explicitly formulate a general Multi Period Information Retrieval problem, where we consider retrieval as a stochastic yet controllable process. The ranking action during the process continuously controls the retrieval system's dynamics, and an optimal ranking policy is found in order to maximise the overall users' satisfaction over the multiple periods as much as possible. Our derivations show interesting properties about how the posterior probability of the documents relevancy evolves from users feedbacks through clicks, and provides a plug-in framework for incorporating different click models. Based on the Multi-Armed Bandit theory, we propose a simple implementation of our framework using a dynamic ranking rule that takes rank bias and exploration of documents into account. We use TREC data to learn a suitable exploration parameter for our model, and then analyse its performance and a number of variants using a search log data set; the experiments suggest an ability to explore document relevance dynamically over time using user feedback in a way that can handle rank bias.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.