Paper detail

Iterative Configuration Interaction with Selection

Even when starting with a very poor initial guess, the iterative configuration interaction (iCI) approach can converge from above to full CI very quickly by constructing and diagonalizing a small Hamiltonian matrix at each macro/micro-iteration. However, iCI scales exponentially with respect to the numbers of electrons and orbitals. The problem can be mitigated by observing that a vast number of configurations have little weights in the wave function and do not contribute to the correlation energy. The real questions are then (a) how to identify important configurations in the early stage of the calculation and (b) how to account for the residual contributions of those unimportant configurations. It is generally true that if a high-quality yet compact variational space can be determined for describing the static correlation, a low-order treatment of the residual dynamic correlation would be sufficient. While this is common to all selected CI schemes, the `iCI with selection' scheme presented here has the following distinctive features: (1) Full spin symmetry is maintained. (2) Although the selection is performed on individual CSFs, it is orbital configurations (oCFG) that are used as the organizing units. (3) Given a coefficient pruning-threshold, the selection of important oCFGs/CSFs is performed iteratively until convergence. (4) At each iteration for the growth of wave function, the first-order interacting space is decomposed into disjoint subspaces to reduce memory requirement and facilitate parallelization. (5) Upper bounds for the interactions between oCFG pairs are used to screen each first-order interacting subspace before the first-order coefficients of individual CSFs are evaluated. (6) Upon termination of the selection, dynamic correlation is estimated by using the ENPT2 theory. The efficacy of the iCIPT2 scheme is demonstrated numerically by taking several examples.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.