Paper detail

Iterative Bayesian Monte Carlo for nuclear data evaluation

In this work, we explore the use of an iterative Bayesian Monte Carlo (IBM) procedure for nuclear data evaluation within a Talys Evaluated Nuclear data Library (TENDL) framework. In order to identify the model and parameter combinations that reproduce selected experimental data, different physical models implemented within the TALYS code, were sampled and varied simultaneously to produce random input files with unique model combinations. All the models considered were assumed to be equal a priori. Parameters to these models were then varied simultaneously using the TALYS code system to produce a set of random ENDF files which were processed into x-y tables for comparison with selected experimental data from the EXFOR database within a Bayesian framework. To improve our fit to experimental data, we iteratively update our 'best' file - the file that maximises the likelihood function - by re-sampling model parameters around this file. The method proposed has been applied for the evaluation of p+Cd-111 and Co-59 between 1 - 100 MeV incident energy region. Finally, the adjusted files were compared with experimental data from the EXFOR database as well as with evaluations from the TENDL-2017 and JENDL-4.0/HE nuclear data libraries.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.