Paper detail

It should be Einstein-Laub Equations inside Matter

In a recent article [1], Mansuripur has claimed that inside the matter, conventional Lorentz Force law should be abandoned in favor of a more general expression of the electromagnetic force density such as the one discovered by A. Einstein and J.Laub in 1908. The main focus of the claim of Mansuripur is based on special theory of relativity. According to [1], Lorentz force law is incompatible with special theory of relativity. In this article, we have focused in favor of Einstein-Laub equations (Force law; associated stress tensor, momentum density, Poynting vector etc) from quite different point of views. Especially we have tried to include previously and recently reported experimental observations, Abraham, Minkowski and Nelson controversy, Quantum Electrodynamics and most importantly the significance of associated stress tensors to judge the problem from a broader and engineering point of view. At the end of the day, considering all the issues, we have found that only Einstein-Laub equations can predict the actual total force inside the matter and probably consistent with all other laws of Electrodynamics.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.