Paper detail

It's Not Easy Being Three: The Approximability of Three-Dimensional Stable Matching Problems

In 1976, Knuth asked if the stable marriage problem (SMP) can be generalized to marriages consisting of 3 genders. In 1988, Alkan showed that the natural generalization of SMP to 3 genders ($3$GSM) need not admit a stable marriage. Three years later, Ng and Hirschberg proved that it is NP-complete to determine if given preferences admit a stable marriage. They further prove an analogous result for the $3$ person stable assignment ($3$PSA) problem. In light of Ng and Hirschberg's NP-hardness result for $3$GSM and $3$PSA, we initiate the study of approximate versions of these problems. In particular, we describe two optimization variants of $3$GSM and $3$PSA: maximally stable marriage/matching (MSM) and maximum stable submarriage/submatching (MSS). We show that both variants are NP-hard to approximate within some fixed constant factor. Conversely, we describe a simple polynomial time algorithm which computes constant factor approximations for the maximally stable marriage and matching problems. Thus both variants of MSM are APX-complete.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.