Paper detail

Issues with time--distance inversions for supergranular flows

Aims. Recent studies showed that time--distance inversions for flows start to be dominated by a random noise at a depth of only a few Mm. It was proposed that the ensemble averaging might be a solution to learn about the structure of the convective flows, e.g., about the depth structure of supergranulation. Methods. Time--distance inversion is applied to the statistical sample of ~$10^4$ supergranules, which allows to regularise weakly about the random-noise term of the inversion cost function and hence to have a much better localisation in space. We compare these inversions at four depths (1.9, 2.9, 4.3, and 6.2 Mm) when using different spatio-temporal filtering schemes in order to gain confidence about these inferences. Results. The flows inferred by using different spatio-temporal filtering schemes are different (even by the sign) even-though the formal averaging kernels and the random-noise levels are very similar. The inverted flows alterates its sign several times with depth. It is suggested that this is due to the inaccuracies in the forward problem that are possibly amplified by the inversion. It is possible that also other time--distance inversions are affected by this issue.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.