Paper detail

Isotropy constraints on powerful sources of ultrahigh-energy cosmic rays at $10^{19}$ eV

Anisotropy in the arrival direction distribution of ultrahigh-energy cosmic rays (UHECRs) produced by powerful sources is numerically evaluated. We show that, taking account of the Galactic magnetic field, nondetection of significant anisotropy at $\approx 10^{19}$ eV at present and in future experiments imposes general upper limits on UHECR proton luminosity of steady sources as a function of source redshifts. The upper limits constrain the existence of typical steady sources in the local universe and limit the local density of $10^{19}$ eV UHECR sources to be $\gtrsim 10^{-3}$ Mpc$^{-3},$ assuming average intergalactic magnetic fields less than $10^{-9}$ G. This isotropy, which is stronger than measured at the highest energies, may indicate the transient generation of UHECRs. Our anisotropy calculations are applied for extreme high-frequency-peaked BL Lac objects 1ES 0229+200, 1ES 1101-232, and 1ES 0347-121, to test the UHECR-induced cascade model, in which beamed UHECR protons generate TeV radiation in transit from sources. While the magnetic-field structure surrounding the sources affects the required absolute cosmic-ray luminosity of the blazars, the magnetic-field structure surrounding the Milky Way directly affects the observed anisotropy. If both of the magnetic fields are weak enough, significant UHECR anisotropy from these blazars should be detectable by the Pierre Auger Observatory unless the maximum energy of UHECR protons is well below $10^{19}$ eV. Furthermore, if these are the sources of UHECRs above $10^{19}$ eV, a local magnetic structure surrounding the Milky Way is needed to explain the observed isotropy at $\sim 10^{19}$ eV, which may be incompatible with large magnetic structures around all galaxies for the UHECR-induced cascade model to work with reasonable jet powers.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.