Paper detail

Isotropic finite-difference approximations for phase-field simulations of polycrystalline alloy solidification

Phase-field models of microstructural pattern formation during alloy solidification are commonly solved numerically using the finite-difference method, which is ideally suited to carry out computationally efficient simulations on massively parallel computer architectures such as Graphic Processing Units. However, one known drawback of this method is that the discretization of differential terms involving spatial derivatives introduces a spurious lattice anisotropy that can influence the solid-liquid interface dynamics. We find that this influence is significant for the case of polycrystalline dendritic solidification, where the crystal axes of different grains do not generally coincide with the reference axes of the finite-difference lattice. In particular, we find that with the commonly used finite-difference implementation of the quantitative phase-field model of binary alloy solidification, both the operating state of the dendrite tip and the dendrite growth orientation are strongly affected by the lattice anisotropy. To circumvent this problem, we use known methods in both real and Fourier space to derive finite-difference approximations of leading differential terms in 2D and 3D that are isotropic at order $h^2$ of the lattice spacing $h$. Importantly, those terms include the divergence of the anti-trapping current that is found to have a critical influence on pattern selection. The 2D and 3D discretizations use an approximated form of the anti-trapping current that facilitates the Fourier-space derivation of the associated isotropic differential operator at $O(h^2)$, but we also derive a 2D discretization of the standard form of this current. Finally, we present 2D and 3D phase-field simulations of alloy solidification, showing that the isotropic finite-difference implementations can dramatically reduce spurious lattice anisotropy effects.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.