Paper detail

Isotopically distinct terrestrial planets via local accretion

Combining isotopic constraints from meteorite data with dynamical models of planet formation proves to be advantageous in identifying the best model for terrestrial planet formation. Prior studies have shown that the probability of reproducing the distinct isotopic compositions of the Earth and Mars for both classical and Grand Tack models is very low. In the framework of the Grand Tack model, for Mars to be isotopically different from the Earth, it had to form under very specific conditions. Here, we subjected a fairly new and unexplored model--the depleted disc model--to the test. It presupposes that the region in the inner protoplanetary disc from Mars' orbit and beyond is depleted in mass such that Mars is left with insufficient material to grow to a larger size. Our aim is to test the whether the distinct isotopic compositions of the Earth and Mars are a natural outcome of this model. We found that the terrestrial planets accrete material mostly locally and have feeding zones that are sufficiently distinct. The Earth and Mars, and by extension, Venus, can have distinct isotopic compositions if there is an isotopic gradient in the terrestrial planet region of the protoplanetary disc. Our results suggest that the material in the inner Solar System most likely did not undergo substantial mixing that homogenised the potential isotopic gradient, in contrast to the Grand Tack model where the feeding zones of the terrestrial planets are nearly identical due to the mixing of material by Jupiter's migration.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.