Paper detail

Isotopic and vibrational-level dependence of H$_2$ dissociation by electron impact

The low-energy electron-impact dissociation of molecular hydrogen has been a source of disagreement between various calculations and measurements for decades. Excitation of the ground state of H$_2$ into the dissociative $b ^3Σ_u^+$ state is now well understood, with the most recent measurements being in excellent agreement with the molecular convergent close-coupling (MCCC) calculations of both integral and differential cross sections (2018 Phys. Rev. A 98 062704). However, in the absence of similar measurements for vibrationally-excited or isotopically-substituted H$_2$, cross sections for dissociation of these species must be determined by theory alone. We have identified large discrepancies between MCCC calculations and the recommended $R$-matrix cross sections for dissociation of vibrationally-excited H$_2$, D$_2$, T$_2$, HD, HT, and DT (2002 Plasma Phys. Contr. F. 44 1263-1276,2217-2230), with disagreement in both the isotope effect and dependence on initial vibrational level. Here we investigate the source of the discrepancies, and discuss the consequences for plasma models which have incorporated the previously recommended data.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.