Paper detail

Isoperimetric estimates in the product of small and large volume manifolds

Let $(M^m,g)$, $(N^n,h)$ be closed Riemannian manifolds, $m,n\geq 2$, with concave isoperimetric profiles and volumes $V_M$, $V_N$ respectively. We consider a one parameter family of product manifolds of the same volume, $(X,G_λ)=(M^m\times N^n,λ^{2n}g+ λ^{-2m}h)$, $λ>0$, and estimate a lower bound for their isoperimetric profile for big $λ$. In particular, we show that for $α\in (\frac{3}{4},1)$ and $v_0 \in (0, V_MV_N)$, there is some $λ_{0}>0$, such that for $λ>λ_0$, we can bound the isoperimetric profile of $(X,G_λ)$: $$ α^{4} f_{M,λ}(v_0) \leq I_{(X,G_λ)}(v_0)\leq f_{M,λ}(v_0)$$ where $f_{M,λ}(v)= λ^{-n} V_N I_{(M,g)}(\frac{v}{V_N})$ and $ I_{(M,g)}$ is the isoperimetric profile of $(M,g)$. Moreover if $(M,g)=(S^m,g_0)$, the $m-$sphere with the round metric, in this setting, we show that some regions of the type ${ D^λ(r)\times N_λ }$, are actual isoperimetric regions in $ (S^m\times N^n,λ^{2n}g_0+ λ^{-2m}h)$ when $λ$ is big enough; being $D^λ(r)$ a disk on $(S^m,λ^{2n}g_0)$ and $N_λ=(N, λ^{-2m}h)$.

preprint2026arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.