Paper detail

Is there evidence for field restructuring or decay in accreting magnetic white dwarfs?

The evolution of the magnetic field of an accreting magnetic white dwarf with an initially dipolar field at the surface has been studied for non-spherical accretion under simplifying assumptions. Accretion on to the polar regions tends to advect the field toward the stellar equator which is then buried. This tendency is countered by Ohmic diffusion and magneto-hydrodynamic instabilities. It is argued that if matter is accreted at a rate of $\dot{M}_{\rm crit} \sim 10^{16}$ g s$^{-1}$ and the total mass accreted exceeds a critical value $ΔM_{\rm crit} \sim 0.1-0.2\ms$, the field may be expected to be restructured, and the polar field to be reduced} reaching a minimum value of $\sim 10^3$ G (the "bottom field") independently of the initial field strength. Below this critical accretion rate, the field diffuses faster than it can be advected, and accretion has little effect on field strength and structure.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.