Abstract

Recently, Sahni, Shafielo o & Starobinsky (2014) combined two independent measurements of H(z)H(z) from BAO data with the value of the Hubble constant H0=H(z=0)H_0 = H(z=0), in order to test the cosmological constant hypothesis by means of an improved version of the OmOm diagnostic. Their result indicated a considerable tension between observations and predictions of the ΛΛCDM model. However, such strong conclusion was based only on three measurements of H(z)H(z). This motivated us to repeat similar work on a larger sample. By using a comprehensive data set of 29 H(z)H(z), we find that discrepancy indeed exists. Even though the value of Ωm,0h2Ω_{m,0} h^2 inferred from Omh2Omh^2 diagnostic depends on the way one chooses to make a summary statistics (weighted mean or the median), the persisting discrepancy supports the claims of Sahni, Shafielo o & Starobinsky (2014) that ΛΛCDM model may not be the best description of our Universe.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.