Paper detail

Is There a Real Difference between $|V_{qb}|_{\rm excl}$ vs. $|V_{qb}|_{\rm incl}$ from Semi-leptonic $B$ Decays?

For a long time there have been active discussions about the sizable differences between $|V_{ub}|_{\rm incl}$ \& $|V_{ub}|_{\rm excl}$. However, the real $|V_{ub}|_{\rm incl}$ might be smaller than usually stated. The connection of the worlds of hadrons and quarks (\& gluons) is subtle: we cannot ignore final states with a pair of $\bar KK$ mesons plus pions: $\left[ R (B \to l ν\; π' s) + R (B \to l ν\; (K\bar K +π's )) \right]$ $\simeq$ $R ([b\bar q] \to l ν\, u (\bar q_i q_i + \bar q_jq_j\bar q_k q_k...) \bar q )$ with $\bar q=\bar u, \bar d$ \& $q_i = u,d,s$. It might show the limits or violations of duality close to thresholds. While inclusive FS cannot be measured, exclusive ones can be done soon by LHCb and later also by Belle II about $B^+ \to l^+ νK^+K^-$ \& $B^0 \to l^+ νK^+K^-π^+$. Present data have not given us the information about resonances in the region of 1 - 2 GeV that we need to understand the underlying dynamics in $ΔS=0$. Future data for exclusive $B \to l νππ$ might also narrow the gap between $|V_{ub}|_{\rm incl}$ \& $|V_{ub}|_{\rm excl}$ in the opposite direction. I comment about $B_s^0 \to l^+ νX_u^{(s)}(ΔS = -1)$.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.