Is There a Real Difference between ∣Vqb∣excl|V_{qb}|_{\rm excl} vs. ∣Vqb∣incl|V_{qb}|_{\rm incl} from Semi-leptonic BB Decays?

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Abstract

For a long time there have been active discussions about the sizable differences between ∣Vub∣incl|V_{ub}|_{\rm incl} \& ∣Vub∣excl|V_{ub}|_{\rm excl}. However, the real ∣Vub∣incl|V_{ub}|_{\rm incl} might be smaller than usually stated. The connection of the worlds of hadrons and quarks (\& gluons) is subtle: we cannot ignore final states with a pair of KˉK\bar KK mesons plus pions: [R(B→lν  π′s)+R(B→lν  (KKˉ+π′s))]\left[ R (B \to l ν\; π' s) + R (B \to l ν\; (K\bar K +π's )) \right] ≃\simeq R([bqˉ]→lν u(qˉiqi+qˉjqjqˉkqk...)qˉ)R ([b\bar q] \to l ν\, u (\bar q_i q_i + \bar q_jq_j\bar q_k q_k...) \bar q ) with qˉ=uˉ,dˉ\bar q=\bar u, \bar d \& qi=u,d,sq_i = u,d,s. It might show the limits or violations of duality close to thresholds. While inclusive FS cannot be measured, exclusive ones can be done soon by LHCb and later also by Belle II about B+→l+νK+K−B^+ \to l^+ νK^+K^- \& B0→l+νK+K−π+B^0 \to l^+ νK^+K^-π^+. Present data have not given us the information about resonances in the region of 1 - 2 GeV that we need to understand the underlying dynamics in ΔS=0ΔS=0. Future data for exclusive B→lνππB \to l νππ might also narrow the gap between ∣Vub∣incl|V_{ub}|_{\rm incl} \& ∣Vub∣excl|V_{ub}|_{\rm excl} in the opposite direction. I comment about Bs0→l+νXu(s)(ΔS=−1)B_s^0 \to l^+ νX_u^{(s)}(ΔS = -1).

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.