Paper detail

Is the X(3915) the chi_{c0}(2P)?

The Particle Data Group has assigned the X(3915) meson, an omega J/psi mass peak seen in B-> omega J/psi decays and in two-photon fusion reactions gamma-gamma->omega J/psi, as the chi_{c0}(2P), the 2^3P_0 charmonium state. Here it is shown that if the X(3915) is the chi_{c0}(2P), the measured strength of the gamma-gamma->X(3915) signal implies an upper limit on the branching fraction Bf(chi_{c0}(2P)->omega J/psi)<7.8% that conflicts with a >14.3% lower limit derived for the same quantity from the B-> K X(3915) decay rate. Also, the absence any signal for X(3915)-> D0 D0-bar in B+ -> K+ D0 D0-bar decays is used to establish the limit Bf(X(3915)->D0 D0-bar) < 1.2xBf(X(3915)->omega J/psi). This contradicts expectations that chi_{c0}(2P) decays to D0 D0-bar would be a dominant process, while decays to omega J/psi, which are Okubo-Zweig-Iizuka suppressed, would be relatively rare. These, plus reasons given earlier by Guo and Meissner, raise serious doubts about the X(3915)=chi_{c0}(2P) assignment.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.