Paper detail

Is the unfoldome widespread in proteomes?

The term unfoldome has been recently used to indicate the universe of intrinsically disordered proteins. These proteins are characterized by an ensemble of high-flexible interchangeable conformations and therefore they can interact with many targets without requiring pre-existing stereo-chemical complementarity. It has been suggested that intrinsically disordered proteins are frequent in proteomes and disorder is widespread also in structured proteins. However, several studies raise some doubt about these views. It this paper we estimate the frequency of intrinsically disordered proteins in several living organisms by using the ratio S between the likelihood, for a protein sequence, of being composed mainly by order-promoting or disorder-promoting residues. We scan several proteomes from Archaea, Bacteria and Eukarya. We find the following figures: 1.63% for Archaea, 3.91% for Bacteria, 16.35% for Eukarya. The frequencies we found can be considered an upper bound to the real frequency of intrinsically disordered proteins in proteomes. Our estimates are lower than those previously reported in several studies. A scanning of proteins in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) searching for segments of non-observed residues reveals that segments of non-observed residues longer than 30 amino acids, are rare. Our observations support the idea that the spread of the unfoldome has been often overestimated. If we exclude some exceptions, the structure-function paradigm is generally valid and pre-existing stereo-chemical complementarity among structures remains an important requisite for interactions between biological macromolecules.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.