Paper detail

Is the luminosity distribution of field galaxies really flat ?

Recent observations of the galaxy population within rich clusters have found a characteristic luminosity distribution described by a flat (alpha = -1.0) Schechter function which exhibits an upturn at faint absolute magnitudes (B Mag = -18). Here we discuss whether such a form for the field luminosity distribution is ruled out by local and/or faint magnitude limited redshift surveys (MLRS). Our conclusions are that existing redshift surveys provide little constraints on the volume-density distribution of field galaxies faintwards of B Mag = -18. The local MLRS suffer from poor statistics over inhomogeneous volumes, while the faint MLRS are ambiguous because of the unknown nature of the ``faint blue excess'' and the ``normalization'' problem. Adopting a functional form similar to that seen in rich clusters we find that the maximum allowable faint end slope, based on the Mt Stromlo-APM redshift survey, is $α\approx -1.8$ faintwards of B Mag = -18.0 (Ho = 50 km/s/Mpc^{3}).

preprint1996arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.