Paper detail

Is the GW150914-GBM really associated with the GW150914?

Finding the electromagnetic (EM) counterpart is critically important for a gravitational wave event. Although many efforts have been made to search for the purported EM counterpart of GW150914, the first gravitational wave event detected by LIGO, only Fermi/GBM reported an excess above background (i.e. GW150914-GBM) at 0.4 s after the LIGO trigger time, that is possibly associated with this GW event (Connaughton et al. 2016). However, since there is no significant detection by the INTEGRAL/SPI-ACS around the time of GW150914-GBM, a great debate has been raised about whether GW150914-GBM is of astrophysical origin and associated with the GW150914 (Savchenko et al. 2016). In order to answer this question, we re-analyzed the GBM data with a straightforward but sophisticated method. We find that the excess of GW150914-GBM mostly comes from those detectors with bad viewing angles to the GW event, whereas the good viewing detectors see nothing significant beyond background fluctuation around the trigger time of GW150914. This finding suggests that GW150914-GBM is very unlikely associated with the GW150914. Given that GW150914-GBM is the only event found by GBM that is possibly associated with this GW event in a comprehensive search, we conclude that GBM did not detect any electromagnetic radiation from the GW150914.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.