Paper detail

Is the dark energy equation of state parameter singular?

A dark energy with a negative energy density in the past can simultaneously address various cosmological tensions, and if it is to be positive today to drive the observed acceleration of the universe, we show that it should have a pole in its equation of state parameter. More precisely, in a spatially uniform universe, a perfect fluid (submitting to the usual continuity equation of local energy conservation) whose energy density $ρ(z)$ vanishes at an isolated zero $z=z_p$, necessarily has a pole in its equation of state parameter $w(z)$ at $z_p$, and, $w(z)$ diverges to positive infinity in the limit $z\to z_p^+$ and it diverges to negative infinity in the limit $z\to z_p^-$ -- we assume that $z_p$ is not an accumulation point for poles of $w(z)$. However, the converse statement that this kind of a pole of $w(z)$ corresponds to a vanishing energy density at that point is not true as we show by a counterexample. An immediate implication of this result is that one should be hesitant to observationally reconstruct the equation of state parameter of the dark energy directly, and rather infer it from a directly reconstructed dark energy density.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.