Paper detail

Is String Phenomenology an Oxymoron?

A brief discussion is presented assessing the achievements and challenges of string phenomenology: the subfield dedicated to study the potential for string theory to make contact with particle physics and cosmology. Building from the well understood case of the standard model as a very particular example within quantum field theory we highlight the very few generic observable implications of string theory, most of them inaccessible to low-energy experiments, and indicate the need to extract concrete scenarios and classes of models that could eventually be contrasted with searches in collider physics and other particle experiments as well as in cosmological observations. The impact that this subfield has had in mathematics and in a better understanding of string theory is emphasised as spin-offs of string phenomenology. Moduli fields, measuring the size and shape of extra dimensions, are highlighted as generic low-energy remnants of string theory that can play a key role for supersymmetry breaking as well as for inflationary and post-inflationary early universe cosmology. It is argued that the answer to the question in the title should be, as usual, {\it No}. Future challenges for this field are briefly mentioned. This essay is a contribution to the conference: "Why Trust a Theory?", Munich, December 2015.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.