Paper detail

Is SGR 1900+14 a Magnetar?

We present RXTE observations of the soft gamma--ray repeater SGR 1900+14 taken September 4-18, 1996, nearly 2 years before the 1998 active period of the source. The pulsar period (P) of 5.1558199 +/- 0.0000029 s and period derivative (Pdot) of (6.0 +/- 1.0) X 10^-11 s/s measured during the 2-week observation are consistent with the mean Pdot of (6.126 +/- 0.006) X 10^-11 s/s over the time up to the commencement of the active period. This Pdot is less than half that of (12.77 +/- 0.01) X 10^-11 s/s observed during and after the active period. If magnetic dipole radiation were the primary cause of the pulsar spindown, the implied pulsar magnetic field would exceed the critical field of 4.4 X 10^13 G by more than an order of magnitude, and such field estimates for this and other SGRs have been offered as evidence that the SGRs are magnetars, in which the neutron star magnetic energy exceeds the rotational energy. The observed doubling of Pdot, however, would suggest that the pulsar magnetic field energy increased by more than 100% as the source entered an active phase, which seems very hard to reconcile with models in which the SGR bursts are powered by the release of magnetic energy. Because of this, we suggest that the spindown of SGR pulsars is not driven by magnetic dipole radiation, but by some other process, most likely a relativistic wind. The Pdot, therefore, does not provide a measure of the pulsar magnetic field strength, nor evidence for a magnetar.

preprint1999arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.