Paper detail

Is right-handed neutrino degeneracy compatible with the solar and atmospheric neutrino data?

In light of the recent solar and atmospheric neutrino data, we investigate the possibility of having an exactly degenerate spectrum for heavy right-handed Majorana neutrinos at the grand unification scale. The analysis is performed in the context of the minimal supersymmetric standard model with unbroken R-parity and extended with three heavy Majorana neutrino fields in order to implement the seesaw mechanism. In the absence of a Dirac-type leptonic mixing, the only source of lepton flavour violation is the right-handed neutrino sector. Inspired by GUT-motivated relations among the quark, charged-lepton and Dirac neutrino Yukawa coupling matrices, and after the inclusion of the radiative effects, we determine the effective neutrino mass matrix at the electroweak scale. Using then the latest global analyses of the solar and atmospheric data at 99% C.L., we conclude that, within this framework, the only solar solutions compatible with the experimental data are the LOW and LMA solutions, being the latter the most favoured one. At 90% C.L., only the LMA solution is allowed.

preprint2001arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.