Paper detail

Is phosphorene with intrinsic defect still an ideal anode material?

The diffusion of Li in electrode materials is key factor to charging/discharging rate capacity of Li-ion battery (LIB). Recently, two-dimensional phosphorene has been proposed as a very promising electrode material due to its ultrafast and directional lithium diffusion, as well as large energy capacity. Here, on the basis of density functional theory, we report that the intrinsic point defects, including vacancy and stone-wales defects, will block the directional ultrafast diffusion of lithium in phosphorene. On the defect-free phosphorene, diffusion of Li along the zigzag lattice direction is 1.6 billion times faster than along the armchair lattice direction, and 260 times faster than that in graphite. By introducing intrinsic vacancy and stone-wales defect, the diffusion energy barrier of Li along zigzag lattice direction increases sharply to the range of 0.17 ~ 0.49 eV, which block the ultrafast migration of lithium along the zigzag lattice direction. Meanwhile, the open circuit voltage increases with the emergence of defects, which is not suitable for anode materials. In addition, the formation energies of defects in phosphorene are much lower than those in graphene and silicene sheet, therefore, it is highly demanded to generate defect-free phosphorene for LIB applications.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.