Abstract
A critique of a prescription of non-locality in [Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4418 (2000)], [Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 040404 (2002)], [Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 130404 (2004)] that appears to be stronger and more general than the Bell-CHSH formulation is presented. It is shown that, contrary to expectations, this prescription fails to correctly identify a large family of maximally non-local Bell states.
Connections
Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.
Building this map preview
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.
Reviews 0
Write a review
No reviews yet.
Discussion 0
Add a comment
No comments yet.