Paper detail

Is neutrino decay really ruled out as a solution to the atmospheric neutrino problem from Super-Kamiokande data?

In this paper we do a detailed $χ^2$-analysis of the 848 days of Super-Kamiokande(SK) atmospheric neutrino data under the assumptions of $ν_μ- ν_τ$ oscillation and neutrino decay. For the latter we take the most general case of neutrinos with non-zero mixing and consider the possibilities of the unstable component in $ν_μ$ decaying to a state with which it mixes (scenario (a)) and to a sterile state with which it does not mix (scenario (b)). In the first case $Δm^2$ (mass squared difference between the two mass states which mix) has to be $>$ 0.1 $eV^2$ from constraints on $K$ decays while for the second case $Δm^2$ can be unconstrained. For case (a) $Δm^2$ does not enter the $χ^2$-analysis while in case (b) it enters the $χ^2$-analysis as an independent parameter. In scenario (a) there is \dm averaged oscillation in addition to decay and this gets ruled out at 100.0% C.L. by the latest SK data. Scenario (b) on the other hand gives a reasonably good fit to the data for \dm $\sim 0.001 ~eV^2$.

preprint2000arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.