Paper detail

Is light neutralino as dark matter still viable?

Motivated by the recent re-confirmation by CoGENT of the low-energy excess of events observed last year, and the recent improved limits from the XENON-100 experiment that are in contention with the CoGENT data, we re-examine the low mass neutralino region of the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model and of the Next-to-Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model, both without assuming gaugino mass unification. We make several focused scans for each model, determining conservative constraints on input parameters. We then determine how these constraints are made increasingly stringent as we re-invoke our experimental constraints involving the dark matter relic abundance, collider constraints from LEP and the Tevatron, and then from flavour physics, as a series of successive 2 sigma hard cuts. We find that for both models, when all relevant constraints are applied in this fashion, we do not generate neutralino LSPs that possess a spin-independent scattering cross section in excess of 10^-5 pb and a mass ~7 GeV < m_chi < ~9 GeV that is necessary in order to explain the CoGENT observations.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.