Paper detail

Is hydrodynamics relevant to RHIC collisions?

The hydrodynamic (hydro) model applied to heavy ion data from the relativistic heavy ion collider (RHIC) in the form of single-particle spectra and correlations seems to indicate that a dense QCD medium nearly opaque to partons, a strongly-coupled quark-gluon plasma (sQGP), is formed in more-central Au-Au collisions, and that the sQGP may have a very small viscosity ("perfect liquid"). Measurements of radial and elliptic flows, with possible coalescence of "constituent quarks" to form hadrons, seem to support the conclusion. However, other measurements provide contradictory evidence. Unbiased angular correlations indicate that a large number of back-to-back jets from initial-state scattered partons with energies as low as 3 GeV survive as "minijet" hadron correlations even in central Au-Au collisions, suggesting near transparency. Two-component analysis of single-particle hadron spectra reveals a corresponding spectrum hard component (parton fragment distribution described by pQCD) which can masquerade as "radial flow" in some spectrum analysis. Reinterpretation of "elliptic flow" as a QCD scattering process resulting in fragmentation is also possible. In this paper I review analysis methods and results in the context of two paradigms: the conventional hydrodynamics/hard-probes paradigm and an alternative quadrupole/minijets paradigm. Based on re-interpretation of fiducial data I argue that hydrodynamics may not be relevant to RHIC collisions. Collision evolution may be dominated by parton scattering and fragmentation, albeit the fragmentation process is strongly modified in more-central A-A collisions.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.