Paper detail

Is Holmberg-II beyond MOND theory?

We compare the basic properties and kinematics of two gas-rich dwarf galaxies: KK246 and Holmberg II (HoII). HoII is 20 times more luminous in the blue-band than KK246 and its HI mass is a factor of 6 higher than in KK246. However, the amplitudes of the rotation curves (at the last measured point) of both galaxies are very similar, of about 40 km/s at a galactocentric radius of 7 kpc. This fact is challenging for modified theories of gravity that predict a one-to-one relation between gravity at any radius and the enclosed baryonic mass in galaxies. In particular, MOdified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND) predicts an asymptotic flat velocity of 60 km/s in HoII. Since the baryonic mass of HoII is dominated by the gas component, MOND overboosts its rotation speed even if the mass of the stellar disk is taken negligibly small. We conclude the rotation curve of HoII is probably inconsistent with MOND, unless the inclination and distance are both fine-tuned to very unlikely values.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.