Paper detail

Is Compton cooling sufficient to explain evolution of observed quasi-periodic oscillations in Outburst sources?

In outburst sources, quasi-periodic oscillation (QPO) frequency is known to evolve in a certain way: in the rising phase, it monotonically goes up till a soft intermediate state is achieved. In the propagating oscillatory shock model, oscillation of the Compton cloud is thought to cause QPOs. Thus, in order to increase QPO frequency, Compton cloud must collapse steadily in the rising phase. In decline phases, exactly opposite should be true. We investigate cause of this evolution of the Compton cloud. The same viscosity parameter which increases the Keplerian disk rate, also moves the inner edge of the Keplerian component, thereby reducing the size of the Compton cloud and reducing the cooling time scale. We show that cooling of the Compton cloud by inverse Comptonization is enough for it to collapse sufficiently so as to explain the QPO evolution. In the Two Component Advective Flow (TCAF) configuration of Chakrabarti-Titarchuk, centrifugal force induced shock represents boundary of the Compton cloud. We take the rising phase of 2010 outburst of Galactic black hole candidate H~1743-322 and find an estimation of variation of $α$ parameter of the sub-Keplerian flow to be monotonically rising from $0.0001$ to $0.02$, well within the range suggested by magneto-rotational instability. We also estimate the inward velocity of the Compton cloud to be a few meters/second which is comparable to what is found in several earlier studies of our group by empirically fitting the shock locations with the time of observations.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.