Paper detail

Is a symmetric matter-antimatter universe excluded?

We consider a non-standard cosmological model in which the universe contains as much matter as antimatter on large scales and presents a local baryon asymmetry. A key ingredient in our approach is that the baryon density distribution follows Gaussian fluctuations around a null value $η= 0$. Spatial domains featuring a positive (resp. negative) baryonic density value constitute regions dominated by matter (resp. antimatter). At the domains' annihilation interface, the typical density is going smoothly to zero, rather than following an abrupt step as assumed in previous symetric matter-antimatter models. As a consequence, the Cosmic Diffuse Gamma Background produced by annihilation is drastically reduced, allowing to easily pass COMPTEL's measurements limits. Similarly the Compton $y$ distorsion and CMB 'ribbons' are lowered by an appreciable factor. Therefore this model essentially escape previous constrainst on symetric matter-antimatter models. However, we produce an estimation of the CMB temperature fluctuations that would result from this model and confront it to data acquired from the Planck satellite. We construct a angular power spectrum in $δT / T_{CMB}$ assuming is can be approximated as an average of $C_\ell$ over a Gaussian distribution of $Ω_B$ using Lewis & Challinor's CAMB software. The resulting $C_\ell$ are qualitatively satisfying. We quantify the goodness of fit using a simple $χ^2$ test. We consider two distinct scenarios in which the fluctuations on $Ω_B$ are compensated by fluctuations on $Ω_{CDM}$ to assure a spatially flat $Ω_κ= 0$ universe or not. In both cases, out best fit have $Δχ^2 \gtrsim 2400$ (with respect to a fiducial $Λ$CDM model), empirically excluding our model by several tens of standard deviations.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.