Abstract

We calculate the vacuum to meson matrix elements of the dimension-4 operator $\barψγ_4\nblr_i ψ$ and dimension-5 operator $\barψ\epsγ_jψB_k$ of the 1−+1^{-+} meson on the lattice and compare them to the corresponding matrix elements of the ordinary mesons to discern if it is a hybrid. For the charmoniums and strange quarkoniums, we find that the matrix elements of 1−+1^{-+} are comparable in size as compared to other known qqˉq\bar{q} mesons. They are particularly similar to those of the 2++2^{++} meson, since their dimension-4 operators are in the same Lorentz multiplet. Based on these observations, we find no evidence to support the notion that the lowest 1−+1^{-+} mesons in the ccˉc\bar{c} and ssˉs\bar{s} regions are hybrids. As for the exotic quantum number is concerned, the non-relativistic reduction reveals that the leading terms in the dimension-4 and dimension-5 operators of 1−+1^{-+} are identical up to a proportional constant and it involves a center-of-mass momentum operator of the quark-antiquark pair. This explains why 1−+1^{-+} is an exotic quantum number in the constituent quark model where the center of mass of the qqˉq\bar{q} is not a dynamical degree of freedom. Since QCD has gluon fields in the context of the flux-tube which is appropriate for heavy quarkoniums to allow the valence qqˉq\bar{q} to recoil against them, it can accommodate such states as 1−+1^{-+}. By the same token, hadronic models with additional constituents besides the quarks can also accommodate the qqˉq\bar{q} center-of-mass motion. To account for the quantum numbers of these qqˉq\bar{q} mesons in QCD and hadron models in the non-relativistic case, the parity and total angular momentum should be modified to P=(−)L+l+1P = (-)^{L + l +1} and J⃗=L⃗+l⃗+S⃗\vec{J} = \vec{L} + \vec{l} + \vec{S}, where LL is the orbital angular momentum of the qqˉq\bar{q} pair in the meson.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.