Paper detail

Is $1^-+$ Meson a Hybrid?

We calculate the vacuum to meson matrix elements of the dimension-4 operator $\barψγ_4\nblr_i ψ$ and dimension-5 operator $\barψ\epsγ_jψB_k$ of the $1^{-+}$ meson on the lattice and compare them to the corresponding matrix elements of the ordinary mesons to discern if it is a hybrid. For the charmoniums and strange quarkoniums, we find that the matrix elements of $1^{-+}$ are comparable in size as compared to other known $q\bar{q}$ mesons. They are particularly similar to those of the $2^{++}$ meson, since their dimension-4 operators are in the same Lorentz multiplet. Based on these observations, we find no evidence to support the notion that the lowest $1^{-+}$ mesons in the $c\bar{c}$ and $s\bar{s}$ regions are hybrids. As for the exotic quantum number is concerned, the non-relativistic reduction reveals that the leading terms in the dimension-4 and dimension-5 operators of $1^{-+}$ are identical up to a proportional constant and it involves a center-of-mass momentum operator of the quark-antiquark pair. This explains why $1^{-+}$ is an exotic quantum number in the constituent quark model where the center of mass of the $q\bar{q}$ is not a dynamical degree of freedom. Since QCD has gluon fields in the context of the flux-tube which is appropriate for heavy quarkoniums to allow the valence $q\bar{q}$ to recoil against them, it can accommodate such states as $1^{-+}$. By the same token, hadronic models with additional constituents besides the quarks can also accommodate the $q\bar{q}$ center-of-mass motion. To account for the quantum numbers of these $q\bar{q}$ mesons in QCD and hadron models in the non-relativistic case, the parity and total angular momentum should be modified to $P = (-)^{L + l +1}$ and $\vec{J} = \vec{L} + \vec{l} + \vec{S}$, where $L$ is the orbital angular momentum of the $q\bar{q}$ pair in the meson.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.