Paper detail

Irregularities in the rate of generation of giant pulses from the Crab pulsar observed at 111 MHz

We present analysis of the rate of giant radio pulses (GPs) emission from the Crab pulsar (B0531+21). Results of our 9 years daily observations with the Large Phased Array radio telescope of Pushchino Radio Astronomy Observatory at 111 MHz were used. Limited sample of 8753 strong individual pulses in 2004 observational sessions was further analysed. It was shown that the observed monthly averaged rate of GPs emission was highly unstable during the entire span of observations and changes by about two orders of magnitude for high-energy pulses. Data were further analysed to search for the possible connection between pulsar glitches and the process of GP emission. We have found a significant increase in the rate of emission of high-energy GPs after MJD 58064, when the largest glitch ever observed in the Crab pulsar was happened. Although considerable changes in GPs emission rate could have been caused by the propagation effects in the nebula itself, we have found that the pulsar had demonstrated high degree of intrinsic irregularity of high-energy pulses emission over long time intervals.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.