Paper detail

Irreducibility criterion, irreducible factors, Newton polygon techniques

Jakhar shown that for $f(x)=a_nx^n + a_{n-1}x^{n-1}+\cdot+ a_0$ ($a_0\neq 0$) is a polynomial with rational coefficients, if there exists a prime integer $p$ satisfying $ν_p(a_n)=0$ and $nν_p(a_i)\ge (n-i)ν_p(a_0)> 0$ for every $0\le i\le n-1$, then $f(x)$ has at most $gcd(ν_p(a_0),n)$ irreducible factors over the field $\mathbb{Q}$ of rational numbers and each irreducible factor has degree at least $n/gcd(ν_p(a_0),n)$. The goal of this paper is to generalize this criterion in the following context: Let $(K,ν)$ be a rank one discrete valued field, $R_ν$ its valuation ring and $\mathbb{F}_ν$ its residue field. Assume that $f(x)=ϕ^n(x) + a_{n- 1}(x)ϕ^{n-1}(x)+\cdot+ a_0(x)\in R_ν[x]$, with for every $i=0,\dots,n-1$, $a_i(x)\in R_ν[x]$, and $a_0(x)\neq 0$ for some monic polynomial $ϕ\in R_ν[x]$ with $\overlineϕ$ is irreducible in $\mathbb{F}_ν[x]$. If for every $0\le i\le n-1$, $nν_p(a_i)\ge (n-i)ν_p(a_0)>0$,} then $f(x)$ has at most $gcd(ν_p(a_0(x)),n)$ irreducible factors over the field $K^h$ and so over $K$ and each irreducible factor has degree at least $n/gcd(ν_p(a_0),n)$, where $K^h$ is the henselization of $(K,ν)$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.