Paper detail

Irradiation-driven escape of primordial planetary atmospheres II. Evaporation efficiency of sub-Neptunes through hot Jupiters

Making use of the publicly available 1D photoionization hydrodynamics code ATES we set out to investigate the combined effects of planetary gravitational potential energy ($ϕ_p\equiv GM_p/R_p$) and stellar X-ray and Extreme Ultraviolet (XUV) irradiation ($F_{\rm XUV}$) on the evaporation efficiency ($η$) of moderately-to-highly irradiated gaseous planets, from sub-Neptunes through hot Jupiters. We show that the (known) existence of a threshold potential above which energy-limited escape (i.e., $η\simeq 1$) is unattainable can be inferred analytically. For $\log ϕ_p\gtrsim \log ϕ_p^{\rm thr}\approx [12.9-13.2]$ (in cgs units), most of the energy absorption occurs where the average kinetic energy acquired by the ions through photo-electron collisions is insufficient for escape. This causes the evaporation efficiency to plummet with increasing $ϕ_p$,. Whether or not planets with $ϕ_p\lesssim ϕ_p^{\rm thr}$ exhibit energy-limited outflows is regulated primarily by the stellar irradiation level. Specifically, for low-gravity planets, above $F_{\rm XUV}\simeq 10^{4-5}$ erg cm$^{-2}$s$^{-1}$ Ly$α$ losses overtake adiabatic and advective cooling and the evaporation efficiency of low-gravity planets drops below the energy-limited approximation, albeit remaining largely independent of $ϕ_p$Further, we show that whereas $η$ increases as $F_{\rm XUV}$ increases for planets above $ϕ^{\rm thr}_p$, the opposite is true for low-gravity planets. This behavior can be understood by examining the relative fractional contributions of advective and radiative losses as a function of atmospheric temperature. This novel framework enables a reliable, physically motivated prediction of the expected evaporation efficiency for a given planetary system; an analytical approximation of the best-fitting $η$ is given in the appendix.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.