Paper detail

Iron Fluorescent Line Emission from the mCvs and Hard X-ray Emitting Symbiotic Stars as a Source of the Iron Fluorescent Line Emission from the Galactic Ridge

The Galactic Ridge X-ray Emission (GRXE) spectrum has strong iron emission lines at 6.4, 6.7, and 7.0~keV, each corresponding to the neutral (or low-ionized), He-like, and H-like iron ions. The 6.4~keV fluorescence line is due to irradiation of neutral (or low ionized) material (iron) by hard X-ray sources, indicating uniform presence of the cold matter in the Galactic plane. In order to resolve origin of the cold fluorescent matter, we examined the contribution of the 6.4~keV line emission from white dwarf surfaces in the hard X-ray emitting symbiotic stars (hSSs) and magnetic cataclysmic variables (mCVs) to the GRXE. In our spectral analysis of 4~hSSs and 19~mCVs observed with Suzaku, we were able to resolve the three iron emission lines. We found that the equivalent-widths (EWs) of the 6.4~keV lines of hSSs are systematically higher than those of mCVs, such that the average EWs of hSSs and mCVs are $179_{-11}^{+46}$~eV and $93_{-3}^{+20}$~eV, respectively. The EW of hSSs compares favorably with the typical EWs of the 6.4~keV line in the GRXE of 90--300~eV depending on Galactic positions. Average 6.4~keV line luminosities of the hSSs and mCVs are $9.2\times 10^{39}$ and $1.6\times 10^{39}$~photons~s$^{-1}$, respectively, indicating that hSSs are intrinsically more efficient 6.4~keV line emitters than mCVs. We compare expected contribution of the 6.4 keV lines from mCVs with the observed GRXE 6.4 keV line flux in the direction of $(l,b) \approx (28.5\arcdeg, 0\arcdeg$). We conclude that almost all the 6.4 keV line flux in GRXE may be explained by mCVs within current undertainties of the stellar number densities, while contribution from hSSs may not be negligible.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.