Paper detail

Iron and nickel diffusion in subdwarf B stars

Pulsations in subdwarf B stars are attributed to radiative levitation of iron-group elements in the stellar envelope. Until now, only iron diffusion is accounted for in stellar models used for sdB seismology. However, nickel has also been suggested as a contributor to the opacity bump that drives the pulsation modes. Stellar models including time-dependent atomic diffusion, as we compute here, are needed to evaluate the importance of different iron-group elements for mode driving. We perform detailed calculations of radiative accelerations of H, He, C, N, O, Ne, Mg, Fe and Ni and include these in Burgers' diffusion equations. We compute the evolution and non-adiabatic pulsations of a typical subdwarf B star. We show that, despite its lower initial abundance, nickel accumulates to comparable mass fractions as iron in the sdB envelope. For accurate determination of pulsation frequencies and mode instability, it is essential that diffusion of both metals are included in stellar models. The role of other iron-group elements remain to be evaluated.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.