Paper detail

IRO: Integrity and Reliability Enhanced Ring ORAM

Memory security and reliability are two of the major design concerns in cloud computing systems. State-of-the-art memory security-reliability co-designs (e.g. Synergy) have achieved a good balance on performance, confidentiality, integrity, and reliability. However, these works merely rely on encryption to ensure data confidentiality, which has been proven unable to prevent information leakage from memory access patterns. Ring ORAM is an attractive confidential protection protocol to hide memory access patterns to the untrusted storage system. Unfortunately, it does not compatible with the security-reliability co-designs. A forced combination would result in more severe performance loss. In this paper, we propose IRO, an Integrity and Reliability enhanced Ring ORAM design. To reduce the overhead of integrity verification, we propose a low overhead integrity tree RIT and use a Minimum Update Subtree Tree (MUST) to reduce metadata update overhead. To improve memory reliability, we present Secure Replication to provide channel-level error resilience for the ORAM tree and use the mirrored channel technique to guarantee the reliability of the MUST. Last, we use the error correction pointer (ECP) to repair permanent memory cell fault to further improve device reliability and lifetime. A compact metadata design is used to reduce the storage and consulting overhead of the ECP. IRO provides strong security and reliability guarantees, while the resulting storage and performance overhead is very small. Our evaluation shows that IRO only increases 7.54% execution time on average over the Baseline under two channels four AES-GCM units setting. With enough AES-GCM units to perform concurrent MAC computing, IRO can reduce 2.14% execution time of the Baseline.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.