Paper detail

Iris Recognition Performance in Children: A Longitudinal Study

There is uncertainty around the effect of aging of children on biometric characteristics impacting applications relying on biometric recognition, particularly as the time between enrollment and query increases. Though there have been studies of such effects for iris recognition in adults, there have been few studies evaluating impact in children. This paper presents longitudinal analysis from 209 subjects aged 4 to 11 years at enrollment and six additional sessions over a period of 3 years. The influence of time, dilation and enrollment age on iris recognition have been analyzed and their statistical importance has been evaluated. A minor aging effect is noted which is statistically significant, but practically insignificant and is comparatively less important than other variability factors. Practical biometric applications of iris recognition in children are feasible for a time frame of at least 3 years between samples, for ages 4 to 11 years, even in presence of aging, though we note practical difficulties in enrolling young children with cameras not designed for the purpose. To the best of our knowledge, the database used in this study is the only dataset of longitudinal iris images from children for this age group and time period that is available for research.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.