Paper detail

iPTF 16asu Revisited: A Rapidly Evolving Superluminous Broad-Lined Ic Supernova?

In this paper, we fit the spectral energy distributions (SEDs) of iPTF 16asu that has so far been classified as a luminous rapidly evolving broad-lined Ic supernova (SN Ic-BL), and re-construct its post-peak bolometric light curve. We find that the luminosity of the post-peak bolometric light curve of iPTF 16asu is about 3 times that of the pseudo-bolometric light curve derived in the literature, and the extrapolated peak luminosity exceeds $\sim 10^{44}$ erg s$^{-1}$, which is higher than the threshold of superluminous SNe (SLSNe). We then use the $^{56}$Ni model and the magnetar plus $^{56}$Ni model to fit the multi-band light curves of iPTF 16asu, and construct the theoretical bolometric light curve using the best-fitting theoretical multi-band light curves. We find that the magnetar plus $^{56}$Ni model can account for the photometry of iPTF~16asu, and the peak luminosity of its theoretical bolometric light curve is $\sim 1.06\times 10^{44}$ erg s$^{-1}$. We suggest that iPTF~16asu and similar SNe (e.g., SN 2018gep) constitute the class of rapidly evolving SLSNe Ic-BL.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.