Paper detail

Ionized Gas Kinematics and Morphology in Sgr B2 Main on 1000 AU Scales

We have imaged the Sgr B2 Main region with the Very Large Array in the BnA configuration ($θ_{beam}$ = 0\farcs13) in both the H52$α$ (45.453 GHz) radio recombination line (RRL) and 7 mm continuum emission. At a distance of 8500 pc, this spatial resolution corresponds to a physical scale of 0.005 pc ($\sim$1100 AU). The current observations detect H52$α$ emission in 12 individual ultracompact (UC) and hypercompact (HC) HII regions. Two of the sources with detected H52 $α$ emission have broad ($Δ$V$_{FWHM}\sim$50 \kms) recombination lines, and two of the sources show lines with peaks at more than one velocity. We use line parameters from the H52$α$ lines and our previous H66$α$ line observations to determine the relative contribution of thermal, pressure and kinematic broadening, and electron density. These new observations suggest that pressure broadening can account for the broad lines in some of the sources, but that gas motions (e.g. turbulence, accretion or outflow) contribute significantly to the broad lines in at least one of the sources (Sgr B2 F3).

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.