Paper detail

Ionization of biological molecules by multicharged ions using the stoichiometric model

In the present work, we investigate the ionization of molecules of biological interest by the impact of multicharged ions in the intermediate to high energy range. We performed full non-perturbative distorted-wave calculations (CDW) for thirty-six collisional systems composed by six atomic targets: H, C, N, O, F, and S -which are the constituents of most of the DNA and biological molecules- and six charged projectiles (antiprotons, H, He, B, C, and O). On account of the radiation damage caused by secondary electrons, we inspect the energy and angular distributions of the emitted electrons from the atomic targets. We examine seventeen molecules: DNA and RNA bases, DNA backbone, pyrimidines, tetrahydrofuran (THF), and C n H n compounds. We show that the simple stoichiometric model (SSM), which approximates the molecular ionization cross sections as a linear combination of the atomic ones, gives reasonably good results for complex molecules. We also inspect the extensively used Toburen scaling of the total ionization cross sections of molecules with the number of weakly bound electrons. Based on the atomic CDW results, we propose new active electron numbers, which leads to a better universal scaling for all the targets and ions studied here in the intermediate to the high energy region. The new scaling describes well the available experimental data for proton impact, including small molecules. We perform full molecular calculations for five nucleobases and test a modified stoichiometric formula based on the Mulliken charge of the composite atoms. The difference introduced by the new stoichiometric formula is less than 3%, which indicates the reliability of the SSM to deal with this type of molecules. The results of the extensive ion-target examination included in the present study allow us to assert that the SSM and the CDW-based scaling will be useful tools in this area.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.