Paper detail

Ionization and excitation of the excited hydrogen atom in strong circularly polarized laser fields

In the recent work of Herath et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 043004 (2012)] the first experimental observation of a dependence of strong-field ionization rate on the sign of the magnetic quantum number m (of the initial bound state (n,l.m)) was reported. The experiment with nearly circularly polarized light could not distinguish which sign of m favors faster ionization. We perform ab initio calculations for the hydrogen atom initially in one of the four bound sub states with the principal quantum number n=2 and irradiated by a short circularly polarized laser pulse of 800nm. In the intensity range of 10^12 to 10^13 Watts/cm^2 excited bound states play a very important role, but also up to some 10^15 Watts/cm^2 they can not be neglected in a full description of the laser-atom interaction. We explore the region that with increasing intensity switches from multiphoton to over the barrrier ionization and we find unlike in tunneling-type theories, that the ratio of ionization rates for electrons initially counter-rotating and co-rotating (with respect to the laser field) may be higher or lower than one.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.