Paper detail

Ionization and electron excitation of fullerene molecules in a carbon nanotube. A variable temperature/voltage transmission electron microscopic study

There is increasing attention to chemical applications of transmission electron microscopy, which is often plagued by radiation damage. The damage in organic matter predominantly occurs via ionization (radiolysis). Although radiolysis is highly important, previous studies on radiolysis have largely been descriptive and qualitative, lacking in such fundamental information as the product structure, the influence of the energy of the electrons, and the reaction kinetics. We need a chemically well-defined system to obtain such data, and have chosen as a model a variable-temperature and variable-voltage (VT/VV) study of the dimerization of a van der Waals dimer [60]fullerene (C60) to C120 in a carbon nanotube (CNT) as studied for individual reaction events at atomic resolution. We report here the identification of five reaction pathways that serve as mechanistic models of radiolysis damage. Two of them occur via a radical cation of the specimen generated by specimen ionization, and three involve singlet or triplet excited states of the specimen, as initiated by electron excitation of the CNT followed by energy transfer to the specimen. The pathways were distinguished by the pre-exponential factor and the Arrhenius activation energy. The prototypal reaction path is the radical cation reaction that we saw at <200 K, but, at >350 K, the excited-state reactions dominate. The results illustrate the importance of VT/VV kinetic analysis in the studies of radiation damage, and show that chemical ionization and electron excitation are inseparable but different mechanisms of radiation damage, which has so far been classified loosely under the single term "ionization."

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.