Paper detail

Ionic Screening and Dissociation are Crucial for Understanding Chemical Self-Propulsion in Water

Water is a polar solvent and hence supports the bulk dissociation of itself and its solutes into ions, and the re-association of these ions into neutral molecules in a dynamic equilibrium, e.g., ${\rm H_2O_2}\leftrightharpoons {\rm H^+~+~HO_2^-}$. Using continuum theory, we study the influence of these reactions on the self-propulsion of colloids driven by surface chemical reactions (chemical swimmers) in aqueous solution. The association-dissociation reactions are here shown to have a strong influence on the swimmers' behaviour, and must therefore be included in future modelling. In particular, such bulk reactions permit charged swimmers to propel electrophoretically even if all species involved in the surface reactions are neutral. The bulk reactions also significantly modify the predicted speed of chemical swimmers propelled by ionic currents, by up to an order of magnitude. For swimmers whose surface reactions produce both anions and cations (ionic self-diffusiophoresis), the bulk reactions produce an additional reactive screening length, analogous to the Debye length in electrostatics. This in turn leads to an inverse relationship between swimmer radius and swimming speed, which could provide an alternative explanation for recent experimental observations on Pt-polystyrene Janus swimmers [S. Ebbens et al., Phys. Rev. E 85, 020401 (2012)]. We also use our continuum theory to investigate the effect of the Debye screening length itself, going beyond the infinitely thin limit approximation used by previous analytical theories. We identify significant departures from this limiting behavior for micron-sized swimmers under typical experimental conditions, and find that the limiting behavior fails entirely for nanoscale swimmers.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.