Paper detail

Investigations of the Systematic Uncertainties in Convolutional Neural Network Based Analysis of Atmospheric Cherenkov Telescope Data

Machine learning, through the use of convolutional and recurrent neural networks is a promising avenue for the improvement of background rejection performance in imaging atmospheric Cherenkov telescopes. However, it is of paramount importance for science analysis that their performance remains stable against a wide range of observing conditions and instrument states. We investigate the stability of convolutional recurrent networks by applying them to background rejection in a toy Monte Carlo simulation of a Cherenkov telescope array. We then vary a range of observation and instrument parameters in the simulation. In general, most of the resulting systematics are at a level not much greater than conventional analyses. However, a strong dependence of the neural network predictions on the noise level within the camera was found, with differences of up to 50% in the gamma-ray acceptance rate in very noisy environments. It is clear from the performance differences seen in these studies that these observational effects must be considered in the training step of the final analysis when using such networks for background rejection in Cherenkov telescope observations.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.