Paper detail

Investigation of Thermal Adiabatic Boundary Condition on Semitransparent Wall in Combined Radiation and Natural Convection

Two thermal adiabatic boundary conditions arise on the semitransparent window owing to the fact that whether semitransparent window allows the energy to leave the system by radiation mode of heat transfer. It is assumed that being low conductivity of semitransparent material, energy does not leave by conduction mode of heat transfer. This does mean that the semitransparent window may behave as only conductively adiabatic (qc = 0) or combinedly conductively and radiatively adiabatic (qc + qr = 0). In the present work, the above two thermal adiabatic boundary conditions have been investigated in natural convection problem for the Rayleigh number (Ra) 10^5 and Prandtl number(Pr) 0.71 in a cavity, whose left vertical wall has been divided into upper and lower parts in the ratio of 4:6. The upper section is semitransparent window, while lower section is isothermal wall at a temperature of 296K. A collimated beam is irradiated with different value (0, 100, 500 and 1000 W/m2) on the semitransparent window at an angle of 45^0 . The cavity is heated from the bottom by convective heating with free stream temperature of 305K and heat transfer coefficient of 50 W/m2K while right wall is also isothermal at same temperature as of lower left wall and upper wall is adiabatic. All walls are opaque for radiation except semitransparent window. The results reveal that the dynamics of both the vortices inside the cavity change drastically with irradiation value and also with the boundary conditions on the semitransparent window. The temperature and Nusselt number increase inside the cavity multifold for combinedly conductively and radiatively adiabatic condition than the only conductively adiabatic condition on the semitransparent window.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.