Paper detail

Investigation of the Solvent-Dependent Photoluminescence Lineshapes in 2,2'-Bithienyl-Substituted 4H-1,2,6- Thiadiazin-4-one

The solvent dependence of 3,5-bis[(2,2'-bithien)-5-yl]-4H-1,2,6-thiadiazin-4-one BBT is investigated via absorption and photoluminescence spectroscopies. Large differences are observed in the photoluminescence (PL) spectra between polar and non-polar solvents. Narrow bandwidths characterize the PL bandshape in non-polar solvents in contrast to polar solvents, while in CCl4, a significant contribution is observed from a blue-shifted species, possibly formed owing to a reaction between the solvent and the molecule that breaks the π-conjugation. Variation of the 0-0 band intensity in the PL spectrum as a function of solvent suggests that longer H-aggregates have a larger contribution in the case of polar solvents. Franck-Condon analysis suggests that the solvent dependence of PL bandshape is owed to the presence of two emissive species in polar solvents. We propose that the second emissive species observed in polar solvents could be due to a stabilized charge-transfer state.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.