Paper detail

Investigation of Rb$^+$ Milling Rates using an Ultracold Focused Ion Beam

Several ion source alternatives for current focused ion beam (FIB) systems have been studied to achieve higher brightness, including cold atom ion sources. However, a study of ultracold ions interacting with often used materials is seldom reported. Here we investigate milling on several typical samples in a prototype ultracold Rb FIB system at 8.5 keV beam energy. For polycrystalline metallic substrates, such as Cu and Au, patterns milled by Rb$^+$ ions are observed to have reduced surface roughness, but still high milling rates compared with those milled by Ga$^+$ ions. Rb$^+$ also shows similar sputter rates as 30 keV Ga$^+$ on semiconductor substrates GaAs and InP. Special cases for Rb$^+$ milling show that the Rb$^+$ ion beam has a $2.6 \times$ faster sputter rate on diamond but a $3 \times$ slower sputter rate on Al compared with a normal 30 keV Ga$^+$ ion beam. Generally, a Rb$^+$ ion beam is shown to be suitable for nanostructuring of several basic materials.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.